Social exclusion and poverty
Income poverty has traditionally been used to measure disadvantage in society.
Social exclusion is a more effective measurement because it takes into account many factors, not simply income.
The widely used income-poverty measure in the graph is calculated not by a fixed amount of income but in relative terms, as household income of less than 60% of the median household income. If everyone’s income increases at the same rate, the level of income poverty stays constant.
Our social exclusion measure, however, includes relative and absolute components. It reflects changes not only in income but also in unemployment, literacy, health and social factors which affect people’s opportunities and quality of life.
Over the period from 2006 to 2015, the percentage of adults in relative income poverty at any point in time has fallen slightly. By contrast, the level of social exclusion fell from 22% in 2006 to 19% in 2008, then rose to 22% in 2013 and has remained fairly steady since then.
Relative income poverty is an important concern and needs to be tackled. However the broader concept of social exclusion allows policy makers to consider many overlapping issues, such as unemployment, poor health and inadequate education, when trying to reduce disadvantage within the community.
To copy this graph for your own use, right-click on the image (or control-click on a Mac) and paste the graph into your document. Please credit 'The Brotherhood of St Laurence and the Melbourne Institute 2017'.
The social exclusion monitor is the work of the Brotherhood of St Laurence and the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (MIAESR). This page was updated using analysis of Wave 15 of the HILDA Survey in December 2017.